
| Line: 1 to 1 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
| Line: 60 to 60 | ||||||||
| Japanese members: M. Mazusawa, H. Yamaoka | ||||||||
| Deleted: | ||||||||
| < < | References : | |||||||
|
| ||||||||
| Line: 95 to 93 | ||||||||
| Japanese members: M. Masuzawa, K. Umemori, K. Tsuchiya, R. Ueki, T. Okada | ||||||||
| Deleted: | ||||||||
| < < | References : | |||||||
|
| ||||||||
| Line: 103 to 100 | ||||||||
| Added: | ||||||||
| > > | Large-scale production of superconducting radio-frequency (SRF) cavities is an industrial challenge, not only because of the increasing number of unit for future projects but also because of requirements in term of reliability, reproducibility and performances very close to the physical limit of polycrystalline bulk Niobium. Challenging SRF accelerator projects like ILC (International Linear Collider) and FCC (Future Circular Collider) are being studied. For such large-scale facilities, higher performances, reduction in fabrication and operation costs are required and essential to proceed with industrialization. An alternative pathway to reduce these costs and improve performances has been proposed by C. Antoine (CEA). Firstly, it consists in applying directly on Niobium sheets an optimized metallographic polishing procedure aiming at removing the damaged layer generated during Niobium sheet manufacturing. This process has been studied in the framework of H2020 European program, European Nuclear Science and Applications Research - 2 (ENSAR2) project (grant agreement N°654002) in collaboration with CEA/IRFU. Secondly, polished Niobium sheets have to be formed and welded to build an elliptical cavity. However, conventional forming techniques might not be applicable as this process would damage too significantly the pre-polished surfaces. All the benefits of the high-quality metallographic polishing would then be lost as a conventional chemical treatment would need to be performed. The aim of this collaborative proposal is to address this second step of the alternative pathway for cavity fabrication. KEK has the experience, ability and facilities to build elliptical cavities. IJCLab/IRFU have the ability and equipment to perform the optimized metallographic polishing procedure for SRF applications and proceed with surface characterization. Sharing and combining our experience and effort will allow us to address, in a very efficient manner, the second step of this alternative pathway. | |||||||
|
French members: | ||||||||
| Changed: | ||||||||
| < < | D. Longuevergne, | |||||||
| > > | D. Longuevergne, C. Antoine, O. Hryhorenko | |||||||
|
Japanese members: T. Dohmae, W. Yuichi, M. Yamanaka, K. Umemori References : | ||||||||
| Changed: | ||||||||
| < < | ||||||||
| > > | [1] “Metallographic Polishing Pathway to the Future of Large Scale SRF Facilities”, O Hryhorenko, CZ Antoine, M Chabot, D Longuevergne, 19th Int. Conf. on RF Superconductivity (SRF'19), Dresden, Germany, 2019. [2] Oleksandr Hryhorenko. "Development and optimization of mechanical polishing process for superconducting accelerating cavities". Accelerator Physics [physics.acc-ph]. Université Paris-Saclay, 2019. English. ffNNT : 2019SACLS566ff. fftel-02455975. | |||||||
|
| ||||||||
| Added: | ||||||||
| > > | Field emission is one of the main reasons for the degradation of superconducting cavity quality factor. Its presence can limit the ultimate performances of superconducting RF (SRF) cavities and hence the cryomodule in which they are assembled. In general, the field emitted current tends to become more severe during the beam operation. Hence, it can affect the entire machine final performance. Dust particles on the cavity surface is one of the most common source of contamination leading to field emission during the cavity operation. For these reasons, it is essential to better understand how this phenomenon is generated and evolve from the SRF cavity preparation, in the clean room, through their assembly in the cryomodule until their final test and operation on the machine. | |||||||
|
French members: E. Cenni, S. Berry, M. Baudrier, L. Maurice, J. Plouin | ||||||||
| Line: 125 to 132 | ||||||||
| Japanese members: H. Sakai, K. Umemori | ||||||||
| Deleted: | ||||||||
| < < | References : | |||||||
|
| ||||||||
| Line: 140 to 145 | ||||||||
| Japanese members: K. Umemori, E. Kako, H. Sakai, T. Konomi, M. Omet, R. Katayama, H. Itoh, T. Okada, K. Takahashi | ||||||||
| Changed: | ||||||||
| < < | References : | |||||||
| > > | ||||||||
|
| ||||||||
| Line: 154 to 159 | ||||||||
| Japanese members: T. Kubo, H. Hayano, S. Kato, H. Monjushiro, H. Ito, T. Saeki | ||||||||
| Deleted: | ||||||||
| < < | References : | |||||||
|
| ||||||||
| Line: 167 to 171 | ||||||||
|
Japanese members: M. Satoh, I. Satake, F. Miyahara, K. Furukawa | ||||||||
| Deleted: | ||||||||
| < < |
References : | |||||||