
| Line: 1 to 1 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scientific Goals of Feynman@Home | ||||||||
| Line: 8 to 8 | ||||||||
| has become a must. For QCD, next-to-leading order computations mitigate scale uncertainties, provide a first estimate of the | ||||||||
| Changed: | ||||||||
| < < | observable normalization and include additional sub-processes that may change some observable distri-bution shape. | |||||||
| > > | observable normalization and include additional sub-processes that may change observable distribution shapes. | |||||||
| Resummation techniques can be checked and improved. But most importantly many QCD processes contribute to the background to Higgs or “new” physics searches; | ||||||||
| Changed: | ||||||||
| < < | If the background is large, it has to be known precisely (roughly better than signal/background ratio), otherwise extracting the signal will become quasi-impossible. This precision can only be obtained by including NLO calculations. | |||||||
| > > | If the background is large, it has to be known precisely (st least better than signal/background ratio), otherwise extracting the signal will become intractable. Such a precision can only be obtained by including NLO calculations. | |||||||
| An experimenter’s wish list has been presented a few years ago, in the frameworks of the Tevatron Run II, it still apply to the LHC energy. One can see that the multiplicity is quite high, from 6 to 8 still keeping the boson undecayed. | ||||||||
| Changed: | ||||||||
| < < | Performing these calculations at tree level is already a substantial effort, at NLO it is a challenge, that Feynman@Home intend to tackle. | |||||||
| > > | Performing these calculations at tree level is already a substantial effort, at NLO it is a challenge. | |||||||
<-- | ||||||||
| Changed: | ||||||||
| < < | ![]() | |||||||
| > > | ![]() | |||||||
| Changed: | ||||||||
| < < | Due to these extreme difficulties, the “les Houches 2005” the wish list was less am-bistious. But it still requires computing power Feynman_at_Home could provide: | |||||||
| > > | Due to these extreme difficulties, the “les Houches 2005” the wish list was less ambitious. But it still requires computing power Feynman_at_Home could provide: | |||||||
| ||||||||
| Line: 49 to 47 | ||||||||
| For example: e+e- nu-e nu-e-bar b b-bar b b-bar goes from 5720 diagrams in the SM to 19508 in MSSM. So the signal is also more and more complex even at tree level. Today achievement for one loop amplitudes processes are presented in “Les Houches 2005” as ‘state of the art for amplitudes, | ||||||||
| Changed: | ||||||||
| < < | although only a few results are available for and are considered as frontier (see. Gudrun Heinrich). | |||||||
| > > | although only a few results are available for 2--> 3 and 2-->4 are considered as frontier calculations (see. Gudrun Heinrich). | |||||||
| ||||||||
| Line: 69 to 67 | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| Changed: | ||||||||
| < < | A lot of effort is directed toward frontier theoretical issues, but often process cannot be computed because they involve too much computing although most if not all theoretical issues a well under control.. The Feynman_at_Home collaboration will be active in both sector of activity | |||||||
| > > | A lot of effort is directed toward theoretical issues, but often process cannot be computed because they involve too much computing although most if not all theoretical issues a well under control. The Feynman_at_Home collaboration will be active in both sectors: Theory and computing. | |||||||
| -- DenisPerretGallix - 26 Oct 2005 | ||||||||
| Line: 1 to 1 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Added: | ||||||||
| > > |
Scientific Goals of Feynman@Home
For the LHC as well as for the linear collider program, the computation of higher precision and high multiplicity processes
has become a must.
For QCD, next-to-leading order computations mitigate scale uncertainties, provide a first estimate of the
observable normalization and include additional sub-processes that may change some observable distri-bution shape.
Resummation techniques can be checked and improved.
But most importantly many QCD processes contribute to the background to Higgs
or “new” physics searches;
If the background is large, it has to be known precisely (roughly better than signal/background ratio),
otherwise extracting the signal will become
quasi-impossible. This precision can only be obtained by including NLO calculations.
An experimenter’s wish list has been presented a few years ago, in the frameworks of the Tevatron Run II,
it still apply to the LHC energy. One can see that the multiplicity is quite high, from 6 to 8 still keeping the boson undecayed.
Performing these calculations at tree level is already a substantial effort, at NLO it is a challenge,
that Feynman@Home intend to tackle.
| |||||||
| META FILEATTACHMENT | attr="" comment="Experimeter's Wish list (K. Ellis, J. Campbell)" date="1130319549" name="ExperimenterWishList.jpg" path="ExperimenterWishList.jpg" size="237708" user="DenisPerretGallix" version="1.1" |
|---|